Elitewheels Drive 2: Wide Aero Wheelset Review

Test Set and Measurements

The wheels tested were a mixed depth set, 50 mm front and 65 mm rear. The recommendation is simple: buy 65 front and rear. Shallower rims have a lower critical speed and will become dynamically unstable earlier. If you value stability, avoid the super shallow option.

Rear 65 mm: 820 g
Front 50 mm: 614 g
Approximate system weight for a 50/50 set: 1,300 g

Internal width: 23 mm (tape error ±0.5 mm)
External width: 31 mm

The hooks on these rims are properly formed and free of the rough finish that plagues cheaper brands. Hookless versions are available from elsewhere but carry the usual risk of tyre blowout at higher pressures.

Rim Profile and Aerodynamics

Elite market this as a hybrid profile. In plain terms it sits between U and V cross sections. The aim is to delay flow separation and reduce yaw sensitivity. The geometry does this reasonably well. Air attachment and breakaway points occur later than on older V profiles, giving improved stability. Aerodynamically they are competent, not class leading.

Spokes and Lacing

The spokes are carbon, elliptical in section, around 4.5 mm at the widest point and 2 mm at the narrowest. Rear lacing is 2:1 with 16 drive side and 8 non drive side. Front is radial on one side, crossed on the other to transfer braking loads. Spokes are captive, so they do not simply fall out if a nipple fails. Build quality is neat.

Hubs and Engagement

The hubs use a large pitch circle diameter for the spoke holes. This increases bracing angle, producing a stiffer wheel at equal tension. The drawback is weight. Elite reduced this with circumferential machining, which is not trivial to manufacture but well executed here.

The ratchet is conical, a variation on the DT Swiss star system. Engagement is rapid, load is spread at a higher radius, and theoretically torque capacity is increased. In practice it feels no different to a flat ratchet. Noise is distinct and will divide opinion.

Dynamic Behaviour

Critical speed is the parameter most riders overlook. At critical speed the axle deflects like a skipping rope and amplifies imbalance. Shallower rims such as 50 mm reach this point at a lower velocity. The 65 mm is significantly more stable. Riders who descend quickly or ride at higher speeds should avoid the 50 mm.

Wide rims are not inherently more aerodynamic. A 23 mm internal and 31 mm external rim has a larger frontal area than a 25 mm wide rim from a few years ago. Wider rims are chosen to accommodate larger tyres and reduce crosswind sensitivity, not to reduce drag.

Verdict

Mechanically these wheels are stiff and well designed. The hub architecture shows thought. Aerodynamically they are good but not best in class. Tubeless is an option, though TPU tubes are lighter and less troublesome.

Negatives:

Ratchet noise is polarising
Weight is acceptable but not outstanding

Positives:

Stiff structure due to hub geometry
Well formed hooks and accurate moulding
Stable at speed if using 65 front and rear
Good overall package for the price

For about £1,000 with discount codes these are a competent wheelset. They will not embarrass themselves in any scenario. If you buy them, you will be satisfied.